Analysing a Chemistry Lesson on Ionic Bonding: Insights from a Learning Study

Authors

  • Vincent Andrew Ministry of Education
  • Hjh Rosinah Hj Sabli Ministry of Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58249/sjse.v4i02.124

Keywords:

chemistry, ionic bonding, lesson study, research lesson, variation theory, Online Teaching

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to report the insights gained from analysing an online Chemistry lesson on ionic bonding as part of a learning study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021. The lesson was collaboratively developed by a group of seven high school Science teachers supported by two facilitators. Data collected includes the lesson plan, the transcript from the virtual lesson, and teacher reports. Insights were drawn from each phase of the learning study cycle – Study, Plan, Teach, Reflect. In the Study phase, the teachers came up with several presumed critical aspects based on responses to a two-part pre-test. In the Planning phase, a pattern of variation was used. In the online Teaching phase, we found potential critical aspects emerged when the students interacted with the object of learning, but this was not picked up by the teacher. The critical aspects identified from the learners’ point of view include the number of shells for each atom and the number of electrons in each shell. In the Reflect phase, we consider the role of facilitators in guiding the lesson to focus on the discernment of critical aspects. The insights gained can potentially support teachers on how to plan and analyse lessons using the variation theory of learning, particularly in the context of online teaching.

References

Bergqvist, A., & Chang Rundgren, S. N. (2017). The influence of textbooks on teachers’ knowledge of chemical bonding representations relative to students’ difficulties understanding. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1295934

Kullberg, A., Ingerman, A. & Marton, F. (2024). Planning and Analyzing Teaching: Using the Variation Theory of Learning. Routledge.

Lewis, C. C., Takahashi. A., Friedkin. S., Liebert, S., & Houseman, N. (2022). Sustained, Effective School-wide Lesson Study: How Do We Get There?. Vietnam Journal of Education. 6 (Special Issue): 45–57. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2022.178

Lo, M. L. (2012). Variation theory and the improvement of teaching and learning. Gothenburg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

Marton, F. & Pang, M.F. (2006). On some necessary conditions of learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 15(2), 193-220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_2

Pang, M. F. & Ki, W.W. (2016). Revisiting the idea of “critical aspects”. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 60 (3): 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2015.1119724

Schon, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals think in Action. London & New York: Routledge.

Thorsten, A. & Tväråna, M. (2023). Focal points for teaching the notion of critical aspects. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 68 (6), 1247-1260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2228817

Vikstrom, A., Billström, A., Fazeli, P., Holm, M., Jonsson, K, Karlsson, G. & Rydstrom, P. (2013). Teachers’ solutions: a learning study about solution chemistry in Grade 8. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies. 2 (1), 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1108/20468251311290114

Wood, K. & Sithamparam, S. (2021). Changing teachers, changing teaching: 21st century teaching and learning through lesson and learning study. New York: Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-04