Empowering Future Biology Teachers: Integrating STEM and Design Thinking for Effective Sustainability Learning

Authors

  • Rahmania Pamungkas Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Hadi Suwono Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
  • Ibrohim Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
  • Agung Wijaya Subiantoro Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58249/sjse.v5i02.175

Keywords:

PRESERVICE BIOLOGY, STEM, DESIGN THINKING, SUSTAINABILITY EDUCATION

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of a design project in a preservice biology teacher education course titled "Biology Education for Sustainability," aiming to enhance creativity while addressing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This work presents a comprehensive framework divided into 10 chapters, spanning approximately 16 weeks (or about three and a half months) of meetings, each corresponding to key lessons designed to empower preservice biology teachers. In addition, the project engages preservice teachers in collaborative teams to identify local environmental challenges related to specific SDGs, such as clean water, climate action, and life on land. Utilizing a design thinking framework, participants engage in brainstorming, prototype development, and iterative feedback that lead to the fostering of innovative solutions. Moreover, data were collected through pre- and post-project surveys, reflective journals, and presentations to assess the impact on creativity, understanding of the SDGs, and confidence in teaching sustainability concepts. The results indicate significant improvements in creative problem-solving skills and a deeper awareness of the SDGs, along with increased motivation to integrate sustainability into their future teaching practices. As a result, this experiment highlights the effectiveness of experiential learning in the "Biology Education for Sustainability" course, preparing preservice teachers to address global challenges through innovative and creative educational strategies.

Author Biographies

Hadi Suwono, Universitas Negeri Malang

Department of Biology, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia 

Ibrohim, Universitas Negeri Malang

Department of Biology, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang, Indonesia

Agung Wijaya Subiantoro, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Yogyakarta State University, Sleman, INDONESIA

References

Adams, P. E., Driessen, E. P., Granados, E., Ragland, P., Henning, J. A., Beatty, A. E., & Ballen, C. J. (2023). Embracing the inclusion of societal concepts in biology improves student understanding. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1154609. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1154609

Al-Hazaima, H., Low, M., & Sharma, U. (2024). The integration of education for sustainable development into accounting education: Stakeholders’ salience perspectives. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-06-2023-0105

Annan-Diab, F., & Molinari, C. (2017). Interdisciplinarity: Practical approach to advancing education for sustainability and for the sustainable development goals. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2, Part B), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.006

Atchia, S. M. C., Chummun, D., & Luckho, S. (2024). Use of design thinking as a strategy to identify and clear students’ misconceptions in photosynthesis: A case study. Journal of Biological Education, 58(3), 666–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2100452

Baran, E., & AlZoubi, D. (2023). Design thinking in teacher education: Morphing preservice teachers’ mindsets and conceptualizations. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2170932

Batty, L., & Reilly, K. (2023). Understanding barriers to participation within undergraduate STEM laboratories: Towards development of an inclusive curriculum. Journal of Biological Education, 57(5), 1147–1169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.2012227

Batz, Z., Olsen, B. J., Dumont, J., Dastoor, F., & Smith, M. K. (2015). Helping struggling students in introductory biology: A peer-tutoring approach that improves performance, perception, and retention. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(2), ar16. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0120

Ben-Eli, M. U. (2018). Sustainability: Definition and five core principles, a systems perspective. Sustainability Science, 13(5), 1337–1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0564-3

Biasutti, M., & Frate, S. (2017). A validity and reliability study of the attitudes toward sustainable development scale. Environmental Education Research, 23(2), 214–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1146660

Blundell, C. N. (2024). A scoping review of design thinking in school-based teacher professional learning and development. Professional Development in Education, 50(5), 878–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2022.2132269

Boncukçu, G., & Gök, G. (2023). A problem-based learning activity to learn about sustainable development. Science Activities, 60(4), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368121.2023.2258353

Brugmann, R., Côté, N., Postma, N., Shaw, E., Pal, D., & Robinson, J. (2019). Expanding student engagement in sustainability: Using SDG- and CEL-focused inventories to transform curriculum at the University of Toronto. Sustainability, 11(2), 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020530

Brunelli, E., & Macirella, R. (2021). Exploring the critical points of teaching STEM subjects in the time of COVID-19: The experience of the course “Microscopy techniques for forensic biology” [version 2; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research, 10(89), 89. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.28455.2

Chang, Ya-Ching, & Hsing-Lung Lien. (2020). Mapping course sustainability by embedding the SDGs inventory into the university curriculum: A case study from National University of Kaohsiung in Taiwan. Sustainability, 12(10), 4274. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104274

Cross, N. (2023). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Dotson, M. E., Alvarez, V., Tackett, M., Asturias, G., Leon, I., & Ramanujam, N. (2020). Design thinking-based STEM learning: Preliminary results on achieving scale and sustainability through the IGNITE model. Frontiers in Education, 5, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00014

Durak, B., & Topçu, M. S. (2023). Integrating socioscientific issues and model-based learning to decide on a local issue: The white butterfly unit. Science Activities, 60(2), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00368121.2023.2179967

Eden, D. S., & Zhang, L. (2019). Creating interdisciplinary collaborative teaching/learning praxis with design thinking, communication, and composition. In Proceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication (pp. 1–6). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328020.3353941

Eidin, E., & Shwartz, Y. (2023). From ideal to practical—A design of teacher professional development on socioscientific issues. Sustainability, 15(14), 11394. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411394

Ericson, J. D. (2022). Mapping the relationship between critical thinking and design thinking. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(1), 406–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00733-w

Fei, C. (2024). Design thinking models and tools to support the design process. In R. Huang, D. Liu, M. A. Adarkwah, H. Wang, & B. Shehata (Eds.), Envisioning the future of education through design (pp. 49–77). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7685-3_3

Goldman, S., & Zielezinski, M. B. (2016). Teaching with design thinking: Developing new vision and approaches to twenty-first century learning. In L. A. Annetta & J. Minogue (Eds.), Connecting science and engineering education practices in meaningful ways: Building bridges (pp. 237–262). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16399-4_14

Goldman, S., & Zielezinski, M. B. (2021). Design thinking for every classroom: A practical guide for educators. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003007957

Gouseti, A., Lakkala, M., Raffaghelli, J., Ranieri, M., Roffi, A., & Ilomäki, L. (2023). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of critical digital literacies and how these are manifested in their teaching practices. Educational Review, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2159933

Honra, J. R., & Monterola, S. L. C. (2024). Fostering cognitive flexibility of students through design thinking in biology education. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2415301. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2415301

Hiong, L. C., & Osman, K. (2013). A conceptual framework for the integration of 21st century skills in biology education. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 6(16), 2976–2983. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.6.3681

Kijima, R., Yang-Yoshihara, M., & Maekawa, M. S. (2021). Using design thinking to cultivate the next generation of female STEAM thinkers. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00271-6

Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking: Part I. Design and Culture, 3(3), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470811X13071166525216

Ladachart, L., & Ladachart, L. (2022). Preservice biology teachers’ decision-making on, and informal reasoning about, an agriculture-based socioscientific issue. Journal of Biological Education, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2022.2058587

Lee de Wet, A. J. C., & Tselepis, T. J. (2020). Towards enterprising design: A creativity framework supporting the fluency, flexibility and flow of student fashion designers. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 13(3), 352–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2020.1818851

Lestari, N., Paidi, & Suyanto, S. (2024). A systematic literature review about local wisdom and sustainability: Contribution and recommendation to science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2), em2394. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14152

Lin, K.-Y., Wu, Y.-T., Hsu, Y.-T., & Williams, P. J. (2021). Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers’ engineering design thinking. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00258-9

Matthews, B., Doherty, S., Worthy, P., & Reid, J. (2023). Design thinking, wicked problems and institutioning change: A case study. CoDesign, 19(3), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2022.2034885

Miller, E. C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2019). Promoting deep learning through project-based learning: A design problem. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0009-6

Suwono, H., Rofi’Ah, N. L., Saefi, M., & Fachrunnisa, R. (2023). Interactive socio-scientific inquiry for promoting scientific literacy, enhancing biological knowledge, and developing critical thinking. Journal of Biological Education, 57(5), 944–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.2006270

Trung, T. T., Ngan, D. H., Nam, N. H., & Quynh, L. T. T. (2024). Framework for measuring high school students’ design thinking competency in STE(A)M education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09922-5

Wingard, A., Kijima, R., Yang-Yoshihara, M., & Sun, K. (2022). A design thinking approach to developing girls’ creative self-efficacy in STEM. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101140

Downloads

Published

2025-12-02

Citation Check