Investigating Critical Thinking Skills in Rural Middle School Students through STEM Education: A Qualitative Case Study from Sumedang

maya umi hajar; Santy Nurmalasari; Akhmad Darmawan

doi:10.58249/sjse.v5i02.200

Authors

maya umi hajar universitas negeri malang, Indonesia
Santy Nurmalasari SMPN 7 Sumedang, Indonesia
Akhmad Darmawan SMAN 1 Gambiran, Banyuwangi East Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58249/sjse.v5i02.200

Abstract

Learning plays a crucial role in fostering students’ critical thinking skills, enabling them to address the challenges they face in their daily lives. This study was conducted in Sumedang, West Java, where students experience limited water availability. The main water sources are located far from residential areas, requiring students to make long trips each morning to fetch water from a distant river. This qualitative descriptive study aimed to explore how students employ critical thinking skills while engaging in contextual STEM learning through the development of a non-electric water pump project. The project involved seventh-grade students participating in science classes using a contextual STEM approach over one semester. Data were collected and analysed through observation, document analysis, and audio and video recordings using Transcript-Based Lesson Analysis. Indicators of critical thinking such as questioning, articulating assumptions, and demonstrating open-mindedness were observed during the STEM learning process of designing the non-electric water pump. The emergence of these skills varied across learning phases, individual characteristics, and group dynamics. Contextual STEM learning not only promotes critical thinking but also equips students with essential life skills for global competition in the 21st century by preparing them to solve real-world problems. The findings of this study provide insights for educators in designing more meaningful science learning experiences in the future.

References

Asher, M. W., Harackiewicz, J. M., Beymer, P. N., Hecht, C. A., Lamont, L. B., Else‐Quest, N. M., Priniski, S. J., Thoman, D. B., Hyde, J. S., & Smith, J. L. (2023, May 1). Utility-value intervention promotes persistence and diversity in STEM. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2300463120

Castle, S. D., Byrd, W. C., Koester, B. P., Pearson, M. I., Bonem, E., Caporale, N., Cwik, S., Denaro, K., Fiorini, S., Li, Y., Mead, C., Rypkema, H. A., Sweeder, R. D., Medinaceli, M. B. V., Whitcomb, K. M., Brownell, S. E., Levesque‐Bristol, C., Molinaro, M., Singh, C., & Matz, R. L. (2024, February 23). Systemic advantage has a meaningful relationship with grade outcomes in students’ early STEM courses at six research universities. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00474-7

Conradty, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). STEAM teaching professional development works: Effects on students’ creativity and motivation. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00132-9

Corrigan, D., Panizzon, D., & Simth, K. (2021). STEM, creativity and critical thinking: How do teachers address multiple learning demands? In R. Berry, A. Buntting, C. Corrigan, & D. Gunstone (Eds.), Education in the 21st century: STEM, creativity and critical thinking (p. 81). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48839-7_6

Ellerton, P., & Kelly, R. (2021). Creativity and critical thinking. In A. Berry, C. Buntting, D. Corrigan, & A. Gunstone, R. Jones (Eds.), Education in the 21st century: STEM, creativity and critical thinking. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48839-7_8

Golden, B. (2023, September 14). Enabling critical thinking development in higher education through the use of a structured planning tool. https://doi.org/10.1080 /03323315.2023.2258497

Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1965124

Husain, F. (2023, May 15). Impact of multiple intelligences and 21st-century skills on future workforce. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v16n3p16

Imaduddin, M., Simponi, N. I., Handayani, R., Mustafidah, E., & Faikhamta, C. (2020). Integrating living values education by bridging indigenous STEM knowledge of traditional salt farmers to school science learning materials. Journal of Science Learning, 4(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v4i1.29169

Kamarrudin, H., Talib, O., Kamarudin, N., & Ismail, N. (2023, June 30). Igniting active engagement in pre-service teachers in STEM education: A comprehensive systematic literature review. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 8(6), 2342. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v8i6.2342

Karampelas, K. (2023, July 1). Critical thinking in national primary science curricula. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(3), 352-366. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejsee/13271

Lacrin, S. (2021). Fostering students' creativity and critical thinking in science education. In R. Berry, A. Buntting, C. Corrigan, & D. Gunstone (Eds.), Education in the 21st century: STEM, creativity and critical thinking. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48839-7_9

Lipman, M. (1988). Critical Thinking: What Can It Be? In Eduational Leadership, 46(1), 38-43.

Morris, J., Slater, E., Fitzgerald, M. T., Lummis, G. W., & Van Etten, E. (2021). Using local rural knowledge to enhance STEM learning for gifted and talented students in Australia. Research in Science Education, 51(2), 501-521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09865-2

Nguyen, L. A. T., & Habók, A. (2023, January 19). Tools for assessing teacher digital literacy: A review. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(1), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00257-5

Patel, S., & Johnson, L. (2023). Reflective teaching practices through structured feedback: A case study in teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 46(3), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2023.2022203

Saleh, M. R., Ibrahim, B., & Afari, E. (2023, April 11). Exploring the relationship between attitudes of preservice primary science teachers toward integrated STEM teaching and their adaptive expertise in science teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(6), 1259-1279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10369-8

Stembridge Labs. (2023, April 10). https://stembridgelabs.com/

Tanti, Kurniawan, D. A., Kuswanto, Utami, W., & Wardhana, I. (2020). Science process skills and critical thinking in science: Urban and rural disparity. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(4), 489–498. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.24139

Totten, V. Y., Simon, E. L., Jalili, M., & Sawe, H. R. (2020, January 1). Acquiring data in medical research: A research primer for low- and middle-income countries. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 10(2), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2020.09.009

Vance, F., Nielsen, K., Garza, V., Keicher, A., & Dana, H. (2016). Design for success: developing a STEM Ecosystem. University of San Diego. https://stemecosystems.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/USD-Critical-Factors-Final_121916.pdf

Yuan, R., & Liao, W. (2023, August 18). Critical thinking in teacher education: Where do we stand and where can we go? https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2252688